The Bank Job, starring Jason Statham, is based on the true story of a 1971 heist in London. The tag “based on a true story” should lead fans to be weary. Details can be changed to fit a filmmakers conceptions and fill in the blanks. I guess I will do the gracious thing and say if you plan on seeing the movie, I have included a bunch of spoilers.
The story of the “walkie talkie” robbers is actually pretty much on the money, at least according to one of an interview with on ex-gang member. The tunneling took three weeks. Digging was only done Friday through Monday morning to avoid complaints from the bank and restaurant next door. Reports distinguished about four or five males and one woman over the radio.
The robbery bared some connections to the Sherlock Holmes tale, “The Red Headed League“. The robbery took place near the legendary office of Holmes, on the corner of Baker Street and Marylebone Road. The robbers realized the connection and left the message, “Let Sherlock Holmes try to solve this” spray-painted on the inside of the vault.
A lot of the conversations between the robbers and the lookout were verbatim. Ham radio owner Robert Rowlands caught the messages while trying to contact a friend in Australia. The cops ignored it as a hoax but Rowlands managed to enlist the help of Scotland Yard. Authorities taped and kept transcripts of some of the conversations. They were unable to trace the robbers before they went off the air.
The plot of the movie centers around the idea that this entire robbery was setup by the British government. That detail according to my research this claim has no proof. The interview from The Mirror with the unidentified gang member seems go against this. It was a bunch of guys in this for jewels and cash.
The robber admitted they found some incriminating photos, though he could not discuss who was in them, or confirm if any were of Princess Margaret. The robbers also stumbled upon some child pornography, disgusted, they left the pictures for the authorities to trace back to the owners.
I looked into the back story of Princess Margaret because although I could guess part of it, I didn’t know any details. She was Queen Elizabeth’s sister and third in line for the throne. She lived extravagantly and there were rumors about her partying nature. Margaret wanted to originally marry Captain Peter Townsend, a previously divorced man. This was a huge scandal at the time, though it may seem insignificant by today’s standards.
She married and divorced Antony Armstong-Jones. She was later connected with Roddy Llewellyn, she was 17 years his senior. The pair met at her villa in the Caribbean where the scandalous pictures mentioned in the movie were supposedly taken.
The pictures were believed to be held in the safe deposit box of radical Michael X. Michael X, or Abdul Malik, was hung for the murder of Gale Ann Benson. The film portrayed Gale as a spy which was not true. Malik’s follower, Edward Chadee reported, “[Gale was] causing Hakim some mental strain, so we have to get rid of her.” They dug Gale a grave and accomplice Marvin Dean, stabbed her.
While the story is close enough to reality it is interesting to take note of the actual history. In the end the robbers did not get away. Four men were arrested though their sentences and names were never released to the media.
I think it is important for audiences to take films as entertainment and learn history through research. I have been doing fact checking on movies since I was a kid watching Pocahontas.
According to other sources Malik was convicted for the murder of Joseph Skerritt and Stanley Abbott was convicted (and also hung) for Gale’s murder. Although Malik was reportedly present he was never charged for her murder.
Check: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=514916&in_page_id=1879&ICO=FEMAIL&ICL=TOPART
omg wow thats crazy i dont think this is true but what ever
They definitely took some liberties and strung together some unrelated events (such as connecting Michael X). I would not have believed this story if I had not found the article with the robber from the Mirror. It was interesting and entertaining to say the least.
And who told you the robber is not BOUND by contract of secrecy with regards to the government ???
So he has to tamper wiht his answers ???
You could never negate things so easily .. There must be some sort of connection that the government is ashamed to let people know of !
OK,,some liberties were taken,,,but it was a movie after all, right? The underlying theme could be one of “unintended consequences”,,which is what happened to all parties involved. Oh, and sticking by your “mates”!
BTW, it’s Jason Statham, not Stratham. Kudos on the rest though.
The only real way to find out how much of this plausible ‘fiction’ is true, would be to ascertain why the original D notices (media suppression notices) were placed over the robbery immediately after it took place in the early 1970s..
These notices, by the UK government are supposed to be issued to protect matters of national security.
So what was it that was in those deposit boxes that threatened national security? Unfortunately the British state at the time was well known for protecting its own frequently sordid secrets – rather than acting for the good of the country.
A reporter should investigate those original D notices.
There seems no clues available as to what was in those boxes. I am not sure if the British government has some kind of time table on documents, like the Americans, so I can’t say honestly whether it will ever be revealed.
The robber in his interview with the Mirror reported some child porn in certain boxes, which the group left to be traced back to their respective owners. My guess is the wrong person had some kiddy porn but really who knows for certain.
“I am not sure if the British government has some kind of time table on documents”
The movie and a few other sources said the D-Notices will be released in 2054. (If they don’t extend that time frame.)
The movie and other sources say that the files on Micheal X would be opened in 2054 again.
It hasnt mentioned anything about the De notices being opened up then ..
Its a well planned ploy.. By the time the notices or files are open , that generation will be near obsolete.
My guess is that if the De notice is revealed… it will be tampered wiht , to make the then British government seem cleaner.. and if its not … the generation woud be well over by then anyway .. so thats that !
Hey monkey…
u should try to watch the cxredits after watching the film…
I had seen the credits, but the fact escaped me. Thanks.
i remember very well first day that news hit the airways in america immediately there was comments linking princess margret, queen elizabeths new husband salso michael x hakim….etc it was all out there in the first day..next day,,some little tidbits and day three there was never another mention on any news casts.. papers etc..like it never happened until this bank job and rightly so portrays what the gossip was on that day,,,,only reason the public doesn’t know more is the fact of queen mum still living….do you think there was a son born to mgaret
& townsend? now there’s DNA so it could be proven,,,,why not know ????
it only shows everone is basically the same royalty gardner whatever who cares??? but the movie certainly hit close
to the one day news blast we heard